Human Dignity and Moral Risk
Routledge Annals of Bioethics Series
Author: Napier StephenLanguage: Anglais
In Print (Delivery period: 12 days).Add to cart the livre of Napier Stephen
· 15.2x22.9 cm · Hardback
Bioethics is a field of inquiry and as such is fundamentally an epistemic discipline. Knowing how we make moral judgments can bring into relief why certain arguments on various bioethical issues appear plausible to one side and obviously false to the other. Uncertain Bioethics makes a significant and distinctive contribution to the bioethics literature by culling the insights from contemporary moral psychology to highlight the epistemic pitfalls and distorting influences on our apprehension of value. Stephen Napier also incorporates research from epistemology addressing pragmatic encroachment and the significance of peer disagreement to justify what he refers to as epistemic diffidence when one is considering harming or killing human beings. Napier extends these developments to the traditional bioethical notion of dignity and argues that beliefs subject to epistemic diffidence should not be acted upon. He proceeds to apply this framework to traditional and developing issues in bioethics including abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, decision-making for patients in a minimally conscious state, and risky research on competent human subjects.
Part I: Foundational Matters: Human Dignity, and The Perception of Value 1. Introduction: Moral Inquiry and the Apprehension of Value 2. Epistemic Justification, Practical Interests, and Peer Disagreement 3. What Are We? Human Beings and the Embodied Mind and Constitutional Views 4. Are We Valuable? In Defense of Intrinsic Dignity Part II: Dignity at the Beginning and End of Life 5. Abortion 6. Human Embryonic Destructive Stem Cell Research 7. Euthanasia Part III: Balancing Dignity and Autonomy 8. Decision-Making for Patients with Covert Consciousness 9. Decision-Making for Patients with Apparent Competency 10. Risky Research on Competent Adults 11. Conclusion