Description
Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India
Transparency, Accountability, and Independence
Coordinators: Sengupta Arghya, Sharma Ritwika
Language: EnglishSubject for Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India:
Publication date: 08-2018
324 p. · 14.9x22.5 cm · Hardback
324 p. · 14.9x22.5 cm · Hardback
Description
/li>Biography
/li>
In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India, by majority, struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), established to appoint judges to the Supreme Court of India and High Courts. Unsurprisingly, the NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. The essays in this volume analyse the NJAC judgment, and provide a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India; analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges and their application in the NJAC Case; and comparatively examines the judicial appointments process in six select countries-UK, South Africa, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Canada, and Nepal-enquiring into what makes a good judge and an effective appointments process.
Arghya Sengupta is the founder of and research director at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi. Ritwika Sharma is a research fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi.
© 2024 LAVOISIER S.A.S.