Amnesty, Serious Crimes and International Law Global Perspectives in Theory and Practice Post-Conflict Law and Justice Series
Auteur : Close Josepha
Amnesty, Serious Crimes and International Law examines the permissibility of amnesties for serious crimes in the contemporary international order. In the last few decades, there has been a growing tendency to consider that amnesties are prohibited in respect of certain grave crimes. However, the question remains controversial as there is no explicit treaty ban and general amnesties continue to be frequently issued in post-conflict and transitional contexts. The first part of the book explores the use of amnesties from antiquity to the present day. It reviews amnesty traditions in ancient societies and provides a global picture of modern amnesties. In parallel, it traces the development of the accountability paradigm underpinning the current prohibitive stance on amnesties. The second part assesses the position of modern international law on amnesties. It comprehensively analyses the main arguments supporting the existence of a general amnesty ban, including the duty to prosecute international crimes, the right to redress of victims of human rights violations, international standards and trends in state practice, and the mandate of international criminal courts. The book argues that, while international legal or policy requirements restrict the freedom of states to extend amnesty in respect of serious crimes, or the effectiveness of amnesty measures in preventing the prosecution of such crimes, these restrictions do not add up to an absolute and universal prohibition.
Introduction;
Part One – The Use of Amnesties from Antiquity to Today;
1. Ancient Amnesties;
2. At the End of War: From the Amnesty Tradition to the Accountability Paradigm;
3. Modern Amnesties and Moral Dilemmas;
Part Two – Assessing the Legality of Amnesties in the Contemporary International Order;
4. The Obligation to Prosecute;
5. International Standards and State Practice;
6. The Right to a Remedy;
7. The Mandate of International Criminal Courts;
Conclusion
Josepha Close is a researcher in International Law who has previously taught Law and Criminology at Middlesex University, London, UK, and is now based in Liège, Belgium.
Date de parution : 12-2020
15.6x23.4 cm
Date de parution : 06-2019
15.6x23.4 cm
Thèmes d’Amnesty, Serious Crimes and International Law :
Mots-clés :
International Humanitarian Law; Amnesty Laws; Prohibition; Amnesty Provision; Amnesty; Blanket Amnesties; International Crimes; Amnesty Clause; International Criminal Law; International Law; Non-international Armed Conflicts; Public International Law; International Criminal Court; International Human Rights Law; Blanket Amnesty Law; Transitional Justice; Human Rights; Peacekeeping; Barrios Altos; Contemporary Conflict; Conditional Amnesties; Customary Law; Jus Cogens Status; Right to Justice; Federal Republic Of Germany; International Criminal Courts; Amnesty Decree; Napoleon Iii; amnesty measures; European Peace Treaties; General Human Rights Treaties; human rights violations; amnesty ban; Hybrid Criminal Courts; Civil Society; Human Rights Offenders; General Amnesty; UN; Pardoning Power